nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 09, v.41 67-73
湟水流域王家庄滑坡变形特征与稳定性分析
基金项目(Foundation): 青海省重点研发与转化计划项目(2023-SF-122)
邮箱(Email): zhaojianyun1981@163.com;
DOI: 10.13774/j.cnki.kjtb.2025.09.006
摘要:

为研究湟水流域典型滑坡的变形特征与稳定性。以湟水流域王家庄滑坡为调查对象,通过现场调查、数值模拟、结合室内综合分析查明该滑坡的变形特征及成因机制,采用双折减系数法分析了滑坡在天然及暴雨工况下的位移场、应力应变场及综合安全系数,并与单强度折减法、极限平衡法结果进行对比,研究了顺层滑坡的稳定性。结果表明:该顺层滑坡前缘处因降雨及人工切坡作用导致坡脚失稳,产生沿坡面向下的牵引力,降雨侵蚀作用导致滑坡后缘处土体抗剪强度逐渐下降,下滑力增大,推动滑坡中部土体沿坡面向下移动,滑坡最终发生失稳破坏,破坏模式为“推移-牵引”式滑坡;天然工况下,单折减时安全系数为1.59,双折减时滑坡安全系数为1.44,均处于稳定状态;在强降雨作用下,滑坡位移场持续增大,剪切应变特征逐渐明显,有效应力呈先增大后减小趋势,安全系数不断下降,单折减时安全系数为1.13,处于基本稳定状态,双折减时滑坡安全系数为1.05,滑坡处于欠稳定状态,容易发生失稳风险。相较于单强度折减法,采用双折减系数法得到的安全系数更为精确合理。双折减系数法能够提高在不同工况下滑坡稳定性分析的准确性,研究成果可为双折减系数法在顺层滑坡稳定性分析中的应用提供参考。

Abstract:

In order to study the deformation characteristics and stability of typical landslides in Huangshui River Basin.Taking the Wangjiazhuang landslide in Huangshui River Basin as the investigation object, the deformation characteristics and formation mechanism of the landslide are identified by field investigation,numerical simulation and indoor comprehensive analysis. The displacement field, stress-strain field and comprehensive safety factor of the landslide under natural and rainstorm conditions are analyzed by double reduction coefficient method. The results are compared with those of single strength reduction method and limit equilibrium method to study the stability of bedding landslide. The results show that the leading edge of the bedding landslide is unstable at the foot of the slope due to rainfall and artificial slope cutting,resulting in a downward traction force along the slope. Rainfall erosion leads to a gradual decrease in the shear strength of the soil at the trailing edge of the landslide,and the sliding force increases,which promotes the soil in the middle of the landslide to move down along the slope,and the landslide finally fails. The failure mode is ' push-pull ' landslide; under natural conditions,the safety factor of single reduction is 1.59,and the safety factor of double reduction is 1.44,both of which are in a stable state. Under the action of heavy rainfall,the displacement field of the landslide continues to increase,the shear strain characteristics gradually become obvious,the effective stress increases first and then decreases,and the safety factor continues to decline. The safety factor is 1.13 when the single reduction is in the basic stable state,and the safety factor is 1.05 when the double reduction is in the basic stable state. The landslide is in an unstable state and prone to instability and failure. Compared with the single strength reduction method, the safety factor obtained using the double reduction coefficient method is more accurate and reasonable. The double reduction coefficient method can improve the accuracy of landslide stability analysis under different working conditions. The research results can provide reference for the application of double reduction coefficient method in the stability analysis of bedding landslide.

参考文献

[1]刘汉东,刘静静,陈家兴.降雨诱发滑坡倾斜变形试验研究[J].华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版),2022,43(5):75-84.

[2]李小根,盛济铭,王静,等.基于双折减系数法与极限平衡法的顺层滑坡稳定性分析[J].华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版),2024,45(6):81-88.

[3]冼进业,陈建林,李长冬,等.复合多层顺倾岩质边坡最优锚固角研究[J].人民长江,2023,54(10):221-227,242.

[4]邓朝辉,宋棋龙,肖明清,等.基于极限平衡法的复合地层TBM隧道围岩稳定性分析[J].现代隧道技术,2024,61(S1):534-542.

[5]周志雄,周凤玺,曹小林,等.复合地基极限承载力的变分极限平衡法分析——竖向增强[J].岩土力学,2024,45(12):3748-3754,3778.

[6]丁梓逸,王宇栋,吴兴贵,等.基于ANSYS有限元强度折减法的土质滑坡地震响应特性研究[J].工业建筑,2023,53(S2):576-582.

[7]成文海,李晨阳,邵世斌.粉质黏土复合边坡稳定性对桩基影响机制分析[J].公路,2025,70(1):198-204.

[8]董天文,林小庆,赵同峰.饱和岩土边坡的孔压增量强度折减极限分析方法[J].地下空间与工程学报,2024,20(5):1485-1490,1540.

[9]唐芬,郑颖人.基于双安全系数的边坡稳定性分析[J].公路交通科技,2008,25(11):39-44.

[10]黄盛锋,陈志波.基于强度折减示意图的边坡稳定分析双折减系数法[J].自然灾害学报,2020,29(4):185-193.

[11]张新启,龚爱民,徐兴倩,等.考虑含水率变化影响的红黏土边坡双强度折减法研究[J].水利水电技术,2020,51(9):181-186.

[12]高崇越,赵健赟,王志超,等.青海省湟水流域潜在地质灾害识别与易发性评价[J].水土保持通报,2024,44(2):245-257.

[13]方宏伟,吴建勋,侯振坤.基于SLFT边坡双折减系数强度失稳判据[J].煤田地质与勘探,2019,47(5):173-178.

[14]张飞雷,苏永华,郭立毅.基于土体软化规律的双折减系数法研究[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2019,16(9):2215-2222.

[15]田迎斌,李科心,赵环帅,等.基于极限平衡法的小窑采空区地基稳定性评价方法研究[J].中国矿业,2024,33(11):113-120.

[16]武博强,李博.基于双强度折减幅值加权法的公路边坡稳定性研究[J].公路交通科技,2023,40(9):75-81,90.

[17]张晓博,周萍,张焜,等.基于GIS和CF-Logistic回归模型地质灾害易发性评价:以青海湟中县为例[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2023,43(4):797-807.

[18]梁译文,查文华,许涛,等.基于Mohr-Coulomb准则隧道围岩-支护体系协同作用下支护强度分析[J].科学技术与工程,2024,24(1):378-385.

[19]温喆然,徐自力,薛杰,等.基于高效流固耦合方法的自由表面流动问题分析[J].科学技术与工程,2025,25(4):1325-1331.

[20] Biot M A.General theory of three-dimensional consolidation[J].Journal of Applied Physics,1941,12(2):155-164.

[21]吕文斌,耿海深,魏赛拉加.基于极限平衡法和Midas/GTS的张家湾滑坡稳定性[J].科学技术与工程,2021,21(11):4369-4378.

[22]刘吉鑫,郭长宝,吴瑞安,等.西藏江达圭利大型深层滑坡蠕滑变形特征与稳定性分析[J].地质通报,2024,43(10):1855-1868.

[23]王志超,赵健赟,温兰冲,等.基于“天—空—地”协同观测的西宁市南川东路滑坡变形特征与稳定性分析[J].水土保持通报,2024,44(2):223-235.

[24]杨校辉,朱鹏,窦晓东,等.甘肃舟曲江顶崖古滑坡复活变形特征与稳定性分析[J].地质通报,2024,43(6):947-957.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13774/j.cnki.kjtb.2025.09.006

中图分类号:P642.22

引用信息:

[1]陈风,许长军,赵健赟,等.湟水流域王家庄滑坡变形特征与稳定性分析[J].科技通报,2025,41(09):67-73.DOI:10.13774/j.cnki.kjtb.2025.09.006.

基金信息:

青海省重点研发与转化计划项目(2023-SF-122)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文